No. 19-126

Gary A. Oram, Jr. v. City of Dillon, Montana, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1985 civil-procedure civil-rights double-jeopardy due-process fair-trial judicial-resolution liability magistrate-jurisdiction private-citizen section-1985 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the Courts able to find a judicial resolution in a §1985(3) claim against one private citizen, after all other individuals in the action are released from liability?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. Are the Courts able to find a judicial resolution in a §1985(3) claim against one private citizen, after all other individuals in the action are released from ‘ ‘ liability? 2. Is it a violation of fair and impartial rights, ; if magistrate is denied jurisdiction by a party then acts to deny a motion magistrate has no authority to approve of, pursuant to the scope in 28 U.S.C. §636. The Tenth Circuit has found these acts to void the ; proceeding. In the above entitled the Ninth Circuit’s opinions conflict with this precedence. Which court is correct in its application of law? : 3. Is it constitutional pursuant to double ; ; jeopardy laws to punish an individual twice for the ‘same offense? i (B).

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-08
Waiver of right of respondents Ceth Haggard and Jeremy Avarez to respond filed.
2019-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Ceth Haggard and Jeremy Avarez
Cynthia Lynn WalkerPoore, Roth & Robinson, P.C., Respondent
Gary Oram
Gary Oram Jr. — Petitioner