Did the lower federal courts err in not permitting petitioner's claims for injunctive relief against a state branch if the ongoing state proceedings violate his U.S. constitutional rights?

Questions Presented 1. Did the lower federal courts err in not permitting petitioner's claims for injunctive relief against a state branch if the ongoing state proceedings violate his U.S. constitutional rights? 2. Can the Seventh Circuit rule a pro se Title VII claim appeal frivolous, fine him $21,350, and impose a filing bar preventing him from litigating an ongoing Title VII Right to Sue claim if the grounds upon the dismissal include disputable judicial noticed facts without an : opportunity to be heard, juxtaposes a prior state court ruling, and ignores material errors? 3. Did the lower federal courts err in dismissing an ongoing injunctive relief claim required by state statute to be filed in a court of competent jurisdiction relating to an ongoing Title VI] post-harassment claim and unchallenged in a motion to dismiss? 4. Did the lower federal courts err in dismissing a Title VII claim on the same state procedural grounds a state court previously used to deny a motion to amend to add the Title VII claim? 5. Can the dismissal of state claims in state court be used for res judicata purposes to dismiss a separately filed related Title VII claim removed to federal court after the state court used its own rules and procedures to deny adding the related Title VI claim? 6. Does a defendant acquiesce to Title VII claim-splitting by agreement, litigating separate . cases, or afguing against a motion to amend to add a Title VII claim citing state court procedures before removing the Title VII claim to federal court? : : 7. Did the lower courts err in denying petitioner the right to sue a judicial hearing officer for injunctive relief presiding over a state administrative dismissal hearing being used outside its statutory authority to violate petitioner’s U.S. constitutional and Title VII rights? 8. Does petitioner’s complaint warrant a complete reset upon learning the presiding judge has a ; former law firm partner who’d be a material character witness had he not dismissed the case? i : Il. |