Whether the State of Tennessee Attorney General's legal opinion denying earned wages for a substituted federal holiday violates federal labor laws

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In this case, the State of Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter issued a legal opinion which affected the civil action of Edward Ronny Arnold v. Bob Oglesby, Et Al, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017) (17C133). This legal opinion, filed in the brief to the State of Tennessee Court of Appeals for the Middle District at Nashville, affected Tenn. Code. Ann. § 4-4-105(a) (1), Title V of the United States Code (5 U.S.C. § 6103) does not address compensation. In essence, the State of Tennessee is not required to pay earned wages to the Plaintiff / Appellant for the substituted federal and state holiday of Columbus Day. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals ; for the Sixth Circuit erred in understanding the legal opinion of the State of Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter denied the Plaintiff / Appellant earned wages and this legal opinion affects all employees of the State of Tennessee to which wages for full-time employees are reduced one day. The denial of compensation for the substituted federal holiday is a violation of 29 CFR § 541.602, to which a fulltime, exempt, employee’s wages cannot be decreased due to the closing of state offices. 2. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred in understanding the Defendant / Appellee did "NOT" send _ the : ii Plaintiff / Appellant a paper copy of the documents submitted to the court in violation of Fed. Rule 5.4.9 SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS BY ELECTRONIC MEANS which requires both parties to consent to electronic filing and constitutes an unequal access to the courts by the low-income, fixed-income, minority Pro Se litigant. : 3. Whether the United States Court of Appeals erred in not challenging the ruling of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee the Defendant / Appellee was not required to respond to the DEFENDANT’S VIOLATION OF FED. RULE. CIV. P.. 5 (B) (E) IN FILING OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY. 4, Whether the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee and the United . . States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred in rendering its decision on documents not valid based : on Local Rule 5.4.9 and Local Rule 7.01 (b) and whether the district court erred in dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.