No. 19-128
Charles Daniel Maye v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: access-restrictions authorized-access circuit-split civil-procedure computer-fraud-abuse-act computer-fraud-and-abuse-act cybercrime-law information-access information-use legal-scope standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 'exceeds authorized access' in the Computer Fraud Abuse Act (CFAA) is limited to violations of restrictions on access to information, and not restrictions on its use
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether “exceeds authorized access” in the Computer Fraud Abuse Act (“CFAA”) is limited to violations of restrictions on access to information, and not restrictions on its use.
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Charles Daniel Maye
William Mallory Kent — Kent & McFarland, Petitioner
William Mallory Kent — Kent & McFarland, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent