Did the Arizona Supreme Court have subject matter jurisdiction to grant attorney's fees on behalf of an appellee after it declined to grant review; alternatively, did the Arizona Supreme Court have jurisdiction to grant attorney's fees in favor of an appellee who failed to file a cross-appeal?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. Did the Arizona Supreme Court have subject matter to grant jurisdiction for attorney's fees on behalf of an appellee after it declined to grant review; (2) alternatively, did the Arizona Supreme Court have jurisdiction to grant attorney’s fees in favor of an appellee who failed to file a cross-appeal? 2. Did the Canadian defendant waive its right to personal jurisdiction under the minimum contacts test, by its choice of law of Ontario, Canada, which has a less stringent test for invoking personal jurisdiction? __ . ii. .