Did the Defendants in 1:15-cv-12870, acting singularly or in concert, criminally falsify the per curiam of the Michigan Court of Appeals docket No. 304639, thereby denying the Petitioner his civil rights?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Rule 14 .1(a) ‘ 1.Did the Defendants in 1:15-cv-12870, acting singularly or in concert, criminally falsify the per curiam of the : Michigan Court of Appeals docket No. 304639, thereby > denying the Petitioner his civil rights? 2.Did Judge Murphy, in his administrative position, by : refusal to inquire into the actions of his subordinates in 1:15-cv-12870, become complicate in the cover-up? 3. Did the Michigan Supreme Court, or their staff, by ~ denying the Petitioner's leave to appeal, become complicate in the cover-up of the Michigan Court of : Appeals falsification? ; ° 4.Did Magistrate Judge Patricia Morris, through her repeated campaigns of snips and quips, misdirection, misinformation, obfuscation, and selective misuse of quota: tions in the three prior actions, unduly influence Judge Ludington’s ORDER? ; 5.Has Judge Ludington become so wedded to his biased positions in the three prior actions, upset with Meitzner’s | : repeated motion to recuse M J Morris, embarrassed with . his case manager’s (17) day late mailing, as to lose the , objectivity needed to form an impartial opinion in Meitzner v. Schuette? ; : 6.Has the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit become complacent ride with the tide, go with the flow in allowing Judge Ludington’s ORDERS to be affirmed? , (See: 24 out of the 25 times... reversals in the 2008 thru 2013 termsl4] ) ™ ; 7.Has the United States Supreme Court allowed itself to become embroiled in this civil rights conspiracy through the Machiavellian manipulations of its staff? ° [1] Wikipedia article about the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. . ii. co