Whether eminent domain can be used as mere pretext to rewrite the parties' own prior bargains, or otherwise circumvent existing obligations in a previously negotiated, enforceable contract

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether eminent domain can be used to as mere pretext to rewrite the parties’ own prior bargains, or otherwise circumvent existing obligations in a previously negotiated, enforceable contract. Whether the Texas Constitution’s adequate compensation standard conflicts with the federal constitutional requirement of just compensation as applied in this case. Whether a state, through judicial action or inaction, may delegate to private entities unbridled, unchallengeable eminent domain authority when courts consistently fail to enforce constitutional limitations.