Whether the second Judge who presided in Plaintiffs civil case violated the Constitution by denying Plaintiff's demand for a jury trial, again, after the Supreme Court of Virginia had reversed and remanded the Motion to Dismiss granted by the first Judge?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the second Judge who presided in Plaintiffs civil case violated the Constitution by denying Plaintiff's demand for a jury trial, again, after the Supreme Court of Virginia had reversed and remanded the Motion to Dismiss granted by the first Judge? 2. Whether the second Judge in Plaintiff's civil case denied Plaintiff's jury trial for an impermissible, unconstitutional motive? 3. Whether the Court’s failure to conduct a de novo proceeding of Plaintiff's appeal from General District Court to Circuit Court as required by statue violated the Constitution?