Does the respondent's creation of a court technicality that reiterated a false claim, incarcerated the prisoner, and originated from a U.S. Court of Federal Claims case with no legal merit, void the petitioner's right to a fair trial and equate free U.S. citizens as incarcerated prisoners?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Respondent created Court Technicality reiterated false claim, incarcerated prisoner, common law originated U.S. Court Federal Claims case 04CV226; no legal merit False Claims litigation Case 04CV226 USCFC technicality no legal standing in a limited court jurisdiction Tucker Act: does Respondent void right to fair trial equated free U S citizens as incarcerated prisoners, established guilty without being heard, no trial, Respondent practiced English law is it constitutional? 2 Court reiterated origin USCFC technicality voids right to file grievance, suppressed evidence of grievance to be heard, enabled Respondent denies Reexamination Clause, Court . Technicality enabled suspend Bill of Rights without due process by issuance common law voids complaint without due process, suppressed evidence never to be heard; is this court technicality a direct violation of Ninth Amendment ? i 8. Courts routinely used incarcerated prisoner common law doctrine: does it obstruct due process Clause Fifth Fourteenth Amendments alters U S government from within voids Guarantee Clause U S Constitution enables Office of President agencies alter law arbitrarily be above the law enabled certified fraud legal; decisions outside jurisdiction U.S Constitution voids Republic? Yes or no