Whether District Court has jurisdiction over state deprivation of federal rights, under the color of state law

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : I. Whether District Court has jurisdiction over state deprivation of federal rights, under the color of state law? a.) Whether Respondents are amenable to suit? b.) Whether Respondents are immune from suit? II. Whether District Court has jurisdiction over Constitutionally impermissible orders? a.) Whether the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees fathers’ Equal Protection of the law? b.) Whether the Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments, guarantees fathers’ Due Process of law? c.) Whether the relationship between a father and pea 4 : | his child, is Constitutionally protected? eg ft {te , Hl. Whether District Court has jurisdiction over ‘ , .«. federal crimes? ve sta "ay Whether Rooker-Feldman bars claims of fraud? , b.) Whether Rooker-Feldman bars disregarded claims? IV. Whether fathers’ have the right to present to the ‘ judiciary, allegations concerning violations of their fundamental Constitutional rights? a.) Whether the right of access to the Court, is assured by the Americans with Disabilities Act? b.) Whether the right of access to the Court, is assured by the Due Process clause? V. Whether the factual allegations stated in the complaint are sufficient to withstand a Rule 12(b) motion? : i PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. The Petitioner is a father attempting to ; exercise his constitutionally protected parental rights, in conflict with a malapropos venue without jurisdiction (C.C.P. Northampton, Respondent). Correspondingly, the Supreme Court of : ; Pennsylvania has a legal obligation to preserve and ; protect guaranteed federal rights, for any person within its jurisdiction.