Did reliance on the Appellate Review Attorney for the Office of the Clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals' instruction for drafting Appellants' Abstract and Brief cause confusion and result in a denial of equal protection and due process under the XIV Amendment to the United States Constitution by the Arkansas Court of Appeals and Arkansas Supreme Court by refusing to accept Danny Tribble and David Tribble's appeal from judgment in the Circuit Court of Baxter County, Arkansas?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did reliance on the Appellate Review .\ttorney for the Office of the Clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals” instruction for drafting Appellants” Abstract and Brief cause confusion and result ina denial of equal protection and due process under the XIV Amendment to the United States Constitution by the Arkansas Court of Appeals and Arkansas Supreme Court by refusing to accept Danny Tribble and David Tribble’s appeal from judgment in the Circuit Court of Baxter County. Arkansas? Did the Arkansas Judiciary deny Appellants’ equal protection by not allowing Appellants” timely request of 16 days to file. out of time. their alstraet and brief after the judiciary was given 9% years [rom Tiling of the complaint, 6% vears Irom filing the last amended complaint, required for the Circuit Court of Baxter County. Arkansas to rule adverse to their claims? PARTIES TO TIE PROCEEDING The parties to the proeeeding in the Arkansas Court of Appeals, Division 1, and Arkansas Supreme Court were Petitioners David Tribble and Danny Tribble, and Respondents lirst Security Bank. Jason Tribble and the State of Arkansas. i