Scope of United States Tax Court jurisdiction under Article I

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) The Scope Of Complete Exclusive Jurisdictional Authority of the United States Tax Court Under Article I of The United States Constitution Upon Title 26, U.S.C,, Section 7441 from 1979 thru 2015; where extraordinary, unprecedented, and special interest circumstances of "(Clash quid-pro-quo fashion in exchange for Court Decision(s) from the Tax Court and the United States Districet Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division, Macon, Georgia; in Consecutive Phases; by Chief District Court Judge Wilbur D. Owens, Junior, from 1985 thru 1999; and Chief District Court Judge C. Ashley Ro: yal, from 2000 thru 2015; upon Appointed Limited Special Trial Judge Continuance from Chief Tax Court Judge Joel Gerbur by His Title 26, U.S.C., Section 7443A Tax Court Authority. (2) The Scope Of Complete Jurisdictional Authority Of The United States District Court for the District Of Columbia, Judge Amit P. Mehta, Term-Time, Juri: sdiction Quisi In Rem; The Power of A Court Over Plaintiff's Interests in Property (meaning Awarded but not Paid Income Tax Refunds and Middleman Fees; Title 26, U.S.C., Sections 162 and 6045(a) and (b), respectively); Civil Complaint Number 1:15-cv-01685 (APM); For Final Judgment Order and Payment Order(s) presented therein where Cognizable Jurisdiction Quasi In Rem was accepted; docketed; and adjudicated with Instruc: tions and Warnings to The Defendant Chief District : Court Judge G. Ashley Royal; "[W]ho Defaulted by Not Filing an Answer or Reply, which is synonymous with the term ‘Guilty As Charged’; but Judge Mehta 'Refused to Acquiesce To; Honor; and Enforce His Transacti-. Promised which Denied Petitioners Procedural Due Pro. cess Rights for Judge Mehta's Miscarriage of Justice.