No. 19-1347
LaDawn Douglas v. Kondaur Capital Corporation
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment as applied and enforced in the courts below constitutes state-action due-process foreclosure MCL § 600.3201 et seq. property-rights 14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process foreclosure foreclosure-by-advertisement michigan-statute property-law state-action takings
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Michigan's foreclosure by advertisement statute, MCL § 600.3201 et seq., as applied and enforced in the courts below, constitutes state action against Petitioner in violation of Petitioner's rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Michigan's foreclosure by advertisement statute, MCL § 600.3201 et seq., as applied and enforced in the courts below, constitutes state action against Petitioner in violation of Petitioner's rights under the 5 and 14 Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 9, 2020)