Do Mireles v. Waco, Brookings v. Clunk, and associated case law combine to grant absolute judicial immunity to all other regulation, Section 1988 suits, the authority of superior Courts, and federal law based on jurisdiction alone as implied by the Sixth Circuit's decision?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Do Mireles v. Waco, Brookings v. Clunk, and associated case law combine to grant absolute judicial immunity to all other regulation, Section 1988 suits, the authority of superior Courts, and federal law based on jurisdiction : alone as implied by the Sixth Circuit’s decision? 2. By extension, do absolute judicial : immunity, Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (relied upon in the District Court’s decision), and 28 U.S.C. Section 1257 unconstitutionally combine to abridge the right to Due Process and Equal Treatment by effectively barring access to higher. Courts for remedy to State Courts’ of last resort, or to intermediate courts’, violations of constitutional guarantees?