No. 19-1372
Angel M. Ayala-Vazquez v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-review certificate-of-appealability due-process evidentiary-hearing fair-trial fifth-amendment judicial-proceedings perjured-testimony sixth-amendment standard-of-review supreme-court-precedent writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts circumvented the standard of review for issuing a certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the lower courts so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court’s supervisory power when they circumvented the standard of review for issuing a certificate of appealability as interpreted by this Court in Welch v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1257, 1264 (2016) and Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003).
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2020)
Attorneys
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent