No. 19-1395

Raleigh Rogers v. Discover Bank

Lower Court: North Carolina
Docketed: 2020-06-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure due-process fraud misconduct misrepresentation new-trial north-carolina-rules pro-se relief-from-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does 'pro se' mean 'no say' or are even pro se litigants eligible for relief from judgment and a new trial pursuant NC §14-1 Rule 60(b)(3) when courts in North Carolina allow licensed opposing counsel to commit fraud, misrepresentation, and misconduct?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED ‘ 1. DOES “PRO SE” MEAN “NO SAY” OR ARE EVEN PRO SE LITIGANTS ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT NC §141IRULE 60(b)(3) WHEN COURTS IN NORTH CAROLINA ALLOW LICENSED OPPOSING COUNSEL TO COMMIT FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, AND MISCONDUCT? ii

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent Discover Bank to respond filed.
2020-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)

Attorneys

Discover Bank
Caren Davis EnloeSmith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP, Respondent
Caren Davis EnloeSmith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP, Respondent
Raleigh Rogers
Raleigh Rogers — Petitioner
Raleigh Rogers — Petitioner