Whether the appellate court has jurisdiction to review the entire remand order or only the portion addressing particular issues

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, once an appeal of a remand order has been explicitly authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), the appellate court has jurisdiction to review the entire : order and all of the legal issues entailed in the decision to remand, as the majority of circuits to consider the issue had previously held, or whether the appel° late court’s jurisdiction to review a remand order is limited to the portion of the remand order addressing particular issues as the Fourth Circuit held in this case. ; . ll . PARTIES INVOLVED The style of the case identifies the parties involved. Petitioner Jason Edward Rheinstein is an individual Maryland resident who is an attorney licensed to practice law in Maryland and several other jurisdic: tions. Respondent Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland is an administrative agency in the judicial branch of Maryland State Government, which regulates Maryland attorneys.1 1 This case involves the removal of a state court proceeding to federal court. In the state court proceedings, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland is the “Petitioner” and Jason Edward Rheinstein is the “Respondent.” There are documents in the