Whether the district court misinterpreted its subject matter jurisdiction

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court misinterpreted its subject matter jurisdiction when dismissing without adjudication petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Federal habeas challenge to Article I military tribunals’ constitutional rulings, where this Court and all U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals have held that the statutory term “in custody” does not mean actual physical confinement as long as collateral consequences from the conviction remain affixed after release, and where a certificate of appealabilty is not required for Federal Section 2241 appeals. i