Is it considered 'misrepresentation' when an individual is not registered with the Secretary of State (SOS), in their state, to represent an entity, but publicly requests funding over the internet and reports on the record to maintain a 501(3) c designation that has the same exact name as another national 501(3) c designated entity, that publicizes its financial backing comes from the United States Small Business Administration?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is it considered “misrepresentation” when an individual is not registered with the Secretary of State (SOS), in their state, to represent an entity, but publicly requests funding over the internet and reports on the record to maintain a 501(3) c ; designation that has the same exact name as another national 501(3) c designated entity, that publicizes its financial backing comes from the United States Small Business Administration? 2. There were allegations against me personally for questioning the validity of a charity, not affiliated with my business entity, and notification of these allegations were mailed to my business, via the United States Post Office, where my front office staff is not authorized to receive service on my behalf for personal matters, so does this constitute . commencement of legal action? i 3. Can personal jurisdiction be obtained over a nonresident without consent as in International Shoe v Washington, 326 US 310 (1945)? 4. If personal jurisdiction is not obtained, and made a special appearance to object and challenge, can it be overruled by the presiding judge and subsequent judgments entered without evidence of the plaintiff making a case for a protective order? 5. If my right to an attorney is denied, in the civil action requesting a protective order, does it pose . challenges, if my civil judgment turns into a criminal proceedings to maintain my Sixth amendment right to an attorney for the same case. 6. With appearance of partiality, as demonstrated in Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988), is it still the Court’s | opinion that if partially can be assumed then ii , partiality may be present, or does it have to be proven, being that the lower court did not agree with appearance being enough? 7. Is there an inherent disadvantage to proceedings . conducted in a Pro Se manner because of the burden on the court if the Plaintiff is pro se and the Court deems it necessary to read the complaint's allegations expansively, especially when faced with a motion to dismiss as stated in White v. Bloom, 621 F.2d 276? . 8. Does the suggestion, as described in United States . v. Day, 969 F.2d 39, 42 (8rd Cir. 1992), that Pro se litigants' court submissions are to be construed liberally and held to less stringent standards than . submissions of lawyers if the court can reasonably read the submissions apply if optional, but preferred, elements are missing? iii 9. Isacopy of the record from any proceedings a right to a party named in a legal action with or without a lawyer present, and denial of such, a violation Fed. R Criminal procedure, Rule 16. Discovery and Inspection, if the civil case has the ability to progress to criminal proceedings? 10. Considering Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, : Rule 4 appeal as a right, is it within the right of the lower state court to deny an appeal? 11. Do local rules of appellate procedure always supersede federal rules if the requirements made by the local are impeded by the lower court due to violations of the law? 12. Is it unconstitutional for a Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit judge to deny my right to a three panel decision? iv : 13. Does it constitute charity fraud when persons are not registered with the Louisiana Attorney General’s office with the understanding that under Louisiana law, charitable organizations that use professional solicitors are required to register annually? 14. Is the SOS universally understood to be the authority to determine whom a legal entity belongs ; to in a particular state? 15. With the designation of a non-profit organization, for charity purposes, does the public reserve the right to directly question the entity about misappropriation of funds when the solicitation was specific and advertised publicly, but there is no evidence of the activity the money was solicited for? 16. Does an individual that represents herself as a ; business reserve the right to obtain a protect