No. 19-1431

David E. Olson, et al. v. Mark O'Brien, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment administrative-hearing administrative-law bias due-process ex-parte ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications fourteenth-amendment notice-and-hearing state-agency
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits biased, ex parte communications between state agency officials which reverse an administrative hearing officer's decision without notice to the parties and an opportunity to be heard?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits biased, ex parte communications between state agency officials which reverse an administrative hearing officer’s decision without notice to the parties and an opportunity to be heard?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent Mark O'Brien, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

David Olson, et al.
Mario Lincoln Bird — Law Office of Mario L. Bird, Petitioner
Mario Lincoln Bird — Law Office of Mario L. Bird, Petitioner
Mark O'Brien, et al.
Katherine Elizabeth Demarest — State of Alaska Department of Law, Respondent
Katherine Elizabeth Demarest — State of Alaska Department of Law, Respondent