Whether Fifth Circuit has again refused to follow the United States Supreme Court Per Curiam as found in Charles Earl Davis v. United States

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Fifth Circuit has again refused to follow the United States Supreme Court Per Curiam as found in Charles Earl Davis v, United States, cites as 389 U.S, decided March 23, 2020. 2. When Fifth Circuit refuse to follow the United States and almost every other Court of Appeals in conducting a plain-error review of unpreserved argument, including unpreserved factual arguments is in line with the U.S, Supreme Court holding in United Sates v. Gonzalez-Castillo, 562 F. 3d 80, 83084 (CA12009); United States v. Romea, 385 Fed. App. 45, 49-50 (CA2 2010); United States v. Griffiths, 504 Fed. App. 122, 126127 (CA3 201 2); United States v, Wells, 163 F. 3d 889, 900 (CA4 1998); United States v. Sargent, 19 Fed. App. 268, 272 (CA6 2001) (kper curium); United States v. Sahakian, 446 Fed, App. 861, 863 ((CA7 201 1); United States v. Thomas, 518 Fed. App: 610, 612-613 (CAI1 2013) (per curium), United States v. Saro, 24 F. 3d 283, 291 (CADC 1994). 3. Whether Fifth Circuit outlier practice of refusing to review certain unpreserved factual arguments for plain error warrants review of a writ certiorari. i