No. 19-1462

Principal Life Insurance Company v. Frederick Rozo

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2)Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: asset-management defined-contribution-plans employee-benefit-plan erisa erisa-fiduciary fiduciary fiduciary-duty investment participant-control rate-of-return retirement-savings withdrawal withdrawal-rights
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a service provider is a fiduciary under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i) when it changes the rate of return on a product offered in an employee benefit plan, even though the plan's participants, by virtue of their freedom to withdraw from the product at any time, retain 'authority [and] control respecting management [and] disposition' of their assets

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED A person is a “fiduciary” under ERISA to the extent that person “exercises any authority or control respecting management or disposition of [the] assets” of an ERISA-governed employee benefit plan. Petitioner offers a product that plan sponsors may choose to make available to plans’ participants. Every six months, petitioner adjusts the rate of return offered to participants who choose to put money into this product, and pre-announces the rate before it goes into effect. Plan sponsors that make this product available to participants agree that if they want to stop offering the product, they must either pay petitioner 5% of the assets allocated to it, or wait 12 months to remove all participants’ monies. Participants, however, can remove their money from the product without waiting or paying anything. As a result, though petitioner adjusts the rate every six months, it lacks the final say over whether any participant’s assets remain invested at any particular rate. The question presented is: Whether a service provider is a fiduciary under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(@) when it changes the rate of return on a product offered in an employee benefit plan, even though the plan’s participants, by virtue of their freedom to withdraw from the product at any time, retain “authority [and] control respecting management [and] disposition” of their assets. (i)

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-21
Brief amicus curiae of The American Council of Life Insurers filed. (Distributed)
2020-07-20
Brief amicus curiae of Stable Value Investment Association filed. (Distributed)
2020-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-15
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Principal LIfe Insurance Co.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent Frederick Rozo to respond filed.
2020-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Frederick Rozo
Peter K. StrisStris and Maher LLP, Respondent
Peter K. StrisStris and Maher LLP, Respondent
Principal LIfe Insurance Co.
Carter G. Phillips — Petitioner
Carter G. Phillips — Petitioner
Stable Value Investment Association
Mark Andrew PerryGibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Amicus
Mark Andrew PerryGibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Amicus
The American Council of Life Insurers
Waldemar Jacob Pflepsen Jr.Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Amicus
Waldemar Jacob Pflepsen Jr.Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Amicus