No. 19-1466

Tammy Korthals v. Bradley Strozeski

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights due-process hope-v-pelzer non-decisional-evidence police police-liability qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether non-decisional evidence must be considered when determining the protections of qualified-immunity

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether non-decisional evidence must be considered when determining the protections of qualified immunity for a police officer as originally held in Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730 (2002). i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent Bradley Strozeski to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Bradley Strozeski
Marcelyn A. Stepanski — Rosati Schultz Joppich & Amtsbuechler, P.C., Respondent
Tammy Korthals
Christopher J. Trainor — Christopher Trainor and Associates, Petitioner