No. 19-1470

Samuel A. Gurrola v. Walgreen Company

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-08
Status: Rehearing
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment monopoly monopoly-power obstruction-of-justice property-rights res-judicata
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the world's largest pharmacy chain influence a State to fabricate evidence to achieve its monopoly goals, abridge plaintiffs rights and steal plaintiff's property in violation of the fourth and fourteenth amendments?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can the world’s largest pharmacy chain influ: ' ence a State to fabricate evidence to achieve its monopoly goals, abridge plaintiffs rights and steal plaintiff's property in violation of the fourth and fourteenth amendments? 2. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (Fifth ; DCA) err dismissing a case being that it exceeded 1 year under Texas statute of frauds when it should have been promissory estoppel because Plaintiff made a substantial 92% delivery? ; : 3. Did the Fifth DCA err in dismissing a fraud . ; claim when a deposition notice was sent to the Walgreen District Manager sent to run the entire purchase and transfer operation was not a District Manager, or supervisor, he was not even a Walgreen employee, he was a person working as a government agent and as such, plaintiff was deprived of his fifth Oo amendment privilege and deprived of hig property. This occurred 5 days after the District Court dismissed ; the case, the Fifth DCA affirmed the lower Court stating plaintiff should have known about the rogue before the case was dismissed? 4. Is 100% control of a market up from 10% control obtained by buy outs and force outs a monopoly? 5. In applying Res Judicata, is the Fifth DCA ; committing manifest injustice? ' 6. Was the destruction of plaintiff's typewriters in the last days of this case considered obstruction?

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-12-02
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-13
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-26
Reply of petitioner Samuel A. Gurrola filed. (Distributed)
2020-08-07
Brief of respondent Walgreen Co in opposition filed.
2020-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Samuel A. Gurrola
Samuel A. Gurrola — Petitioner
Samuel A. Gurrola — Petitioner
Walgreen Co
Merritt Maverick ClementsRay Pena McChristian, PC, Respondent
Merritt Maverick ClementsRay Pena McChristian, PC, Respondent