No. 19-156
Response RequestedRelisted (2)
Tags: blood-seizure fourth-amendment franks-v-delaware misleading-by-commission misleading-by-omission probable-cause schmerber-v-california search-and-seizure warrant-requirements
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the holding of Franks v. Delaware forbid misleading by omission as well as misleading by commission?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I Does the holding of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978) forbid misleading by omission as well as misleading by commission? I Does the holding of Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966) by requiring a showing that taking blood is reasonable to justify a blood seizure warrant, require more for a blood seizure warrant than probable cause?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-27
Brief of respondent State of Texas in opposition filed.
2019-10-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 27, 2019.
2019-10-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2019 to November 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-26
Response Requested. (Due October 28, 2019)
2019-09-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Diego Islas
Clay S. Conrad — Looney & Conrad, PC, Petitioner
Clay S. Conrad — Looney & Conrad, PC, Petitioner
State of Texas
Heather Anne Hudson — Harris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Heather Anne Hudson — Harris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Eric Kugler — Harris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Eric Kugler — Harris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent