No. 19-159
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence memory-loss sixth-amendment testimonial-statement
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a witness's total memory loss prevents him from testifying about his prior out-of-court testimonial statement, and whether the witness's mere presence at trial is enough to provide the defendant with the opportunity for cross-examination guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, when a witness’s total memory loss prevents him from testifying about his prior out-of-court testimonial statement, the witness’s mere presence at trial is enough to provide the defendant with the opportunity for cross-examination guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause. ii STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-15
Reply of petitioner Carlos Tapia filed. (Distributed)
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-10-31
Brief of respondent New York in opposition filed.
2019-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 1, 2019.
2019-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 18, 2019 to November 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-19
Response Requested. (Due September 18, 2019)
2019-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2019-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2019)
2019-06-19
Application (18A1339) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
2019-06-19
Application (18A1339) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until July 31, 2019.
Attorneys
Carlos Tapia
Daniel Adam Rubens — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
New York
James Jiann Wen — Office of the District Attorney, Bronx County, Respondent