No. 19-171

In Re Jack R. Finnegan

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-08-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: 14th-amendment 1st-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment goldberg-v-kelly government-redress judicial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Petitioner denied his Constitutional guaranteed rights, power, privilege, or immunity

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ; 1. Was Petitioner denied his Constitutional , . guaranteed rights, power, privilege, or immunity : guaranteed under the Constitution, and of Due Process and Equal Protection by the Void order for . an appointment of a Receiver, in denial of statutes, — : and decisional laws. Rights are such as belonging to every citizen of the United States by the 1st, 4TH, 57H, 6TH, 8TH, 10th, and 14TH, Amendments. The ; : Constitutional provision of the Due Process Clause requires trial-type hearings prior to the infringement : of individuals’ rights and entitlements? Notable, in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970). 2. Was Petitioner denied his Constitutional guaranteed rights, to petition the Government for a ; redress of grievances, pursuant to the First : : Amendment by the improper protection of a 13-year senior research attorney (court judge) by the Opinion , (Opinion) of the 4 Appellate Court. The improper ~ Notice must be to convey the required information in a point-size of type that complies with the statutes, this was not due process or equal protection? 3. Was Petitioner denied under the Equal Protection Clause, the 14th Amendment guarantee that the government must treat a person or class of : persons the same as other persons or classes in like circumstances? The ground for equitable relief . among others is fraud by preventing a fair adversary proceeding, which cannot be enforced. United States ; v. Throckmorton (1878) 98 U.S. 61, 25 L.Ed. 93. i

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-06-20
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)

Attorneys

In Re Jack R. Finnegan
Jack R. Finnegan — Petitioner
Jack R. Finnegan — Petitioner