No. 19-183
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-defense due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice prejudice-analysis sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-fairness trial-outcome
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal-defense attorney's deficient performance under Strickland v. Washington affects the trial's outcome or renders the trial fundamentally unfair
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In considering whether a_ criminal-defense attorney’s deficient performance was prejudicial under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), is all that matters whether the deficient performance affected the trial’s outcome? Or does it matter if it rendered the trial fundamentally unfair?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent State of Texas to respond filed.
2019-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Mark Douglas Robison
Gary Alan Udashen — Udashen Anton, Petitioner
State of Texas
Clinton A. Morgan — Harris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent