No. 19-183

Mark Douglas Robison v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2019-08-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-defense due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice prejudice-analysis sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-fairness trial-outcome
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a criminal-defense attorney's deficient performance under Strickland v. Washington affects the trial's outcome or renders the trial fundamentally unfair

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In considering whether a_ criminal-defense attorney’s deficient performance was prejudicial under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), is all that matters whether the deficient performance affected the trial’s outcome? Or does it matter if it rendered the trial fundamentally unfair?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent State of Texas to respond filed.
2019-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Mark Douglas Robison
Gary Alan UdashenUdashen Anton, Petitioner
State of Texas
Clinton A. MorganHarris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent