No. 19-20
William Andreoli, et al. v. Youngevity International Corporation, et al.
Tags: anti-SLAPP appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure collateral-order-doctrine final-judgment final-judgment-rule interlocutory-appeal slapp standing
Key Terms:
Arbitration FirstAmendment TradeSecret JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Arbitration FirstAmendment TradeSecret JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal courts of appeals lack interlocutory appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of a motion to strike under a state anti-SLAPP statute
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether federal courts of appeals lack interlocutory appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of a motion to strike under a state anti-SLAPP statute, as the Second Circuit has held, or whether federal appellate courts have such jurisdiction as the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have held.
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-15
Reply of petitioners William Andreoli, et al. filed.
2019-08-01
Brief of respondents Youngevity International Corp., et al. in opposition filed.
2019-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 1, 2019)
Attorneys
William Andreoli, et al.
Jonathan O. Hafen — Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, Petitioner
Jonathan O. Hafen — Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, Petitioner
Youngevity International Corp., et al.
Jonathan Walker Emord — Emord & Associates, Respondent
Jonathan Walker Emord — Emord & Associates, Respondent