Whether the ruling made by the state trial court granting the motion under California Evidence Code 1402 foreclosed Respondent's efforts to seek attorney fees, seize bank accounts, and impose clouds on titles of real property owned by Petitioner

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether the ruling made by the state trial court granting the motion under California Evidence Code 1402, removing Respondent from the litigation, foreclosed thereafter any and all efforts of Respondent to seek attorney fees, seize bank accounts, and impose clouds on titles of real property owned by Petitioner? (2) Whether a state trial court can grant “attorney fees” greatly in excess of a previous award made by the state trial court for “breach of contract” itself, which itself was erroneous, since no contract existed at the time of the grant of said “attorney’s fees”? (8) Whether the Court of Appeals of California failed to recognize the consequences of the trial court’s grant of the Evidence Code 1402 motion? (4) Whether a state court of appeal can refuse to seek explanations of briefs authored by Petitioner during a 30-minute oral argument and thereafter reveal its lack of understanding of Petitioner’s briefs? (5) Whether the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the analysis of Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. __ (February 20, 2019) establish error in the trial court granting “attorney fees” of in excess of the alleged and erroneous $131,260.27 following motions by Respondent and her counsel, which awarded $100,000 plus $31,260.27 interest, plus a previous $250,000, also obtained without authority? li RELATED CASES Jennifer Allert v. Roger S. Hanson, Superior Court of Orange County, No. 30-2015-00786947. Judgment entered June 9, 2017. Jennifer Allert v. Roger S. Hanson, California Court of Appeals 4th App. Dist. Div. 3 No. G055084. Judgment entered March 6, 2019. Jennifer Allert v. Roger S. Hanson, Supreme Court of California No. S-255039. Judgment entered May 15, 2019.