No. 19-202

Solomon McLemore v. City of Shoreline, Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2019-08-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights community-caretaking due-process fourth-amendment free-speech obstruction obstruction-of-justice probable-cause search-and-seizure warrant-requirement warrantless-entry warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-12-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment for States to charge and convict a person of obstruction for passively refusing to open the door to their home when officers conduct a warrantless search based on an exception to the warrant requirement?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED In the middle of the night, police officers came to McLemore’s home and banged on the door, demanding entry without a warrant to investigate a loud argument. McLemore told the officers to show him a warrant or leave. After fifteen minutes, the officers heard glass break and they entered the house pursuant to the community caretaking exception of the warrant requirement. The officers found no evidence of any crimes, but McLemore was arrested, charged and convicted of obstruction for passively refusing to open the door to his home. The Washington Supreme Court issued a split 4-4 opinion that affirmed the conviction and left Washington Law in conflict with precedent established by the United States Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and every other State that has addressed the issue. The question presented is: Whether it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment for States to charge and convict a person of obstruction for passively refusing to open the door to their home when officers conduct a warrantless search based on an exception to the warrant requirement? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS 1. King County District Court, West Division, Shoreline Courthouse, State of Washington City of Shoreline, Plaintiff, v. Solomon McLemore, Defendant, No. 616010940 8/17/2016, Denied Motion to Dismiss. App. 43. 9/27-29/2016, Jury Trial, guilty verdict. 9/29/2016, Judgment and Sentence. 2. Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for the County of King City of Shoreline, Respondent, v. Solomon McLemore, Appellant, No. 16-1-07811-3 SEA 6/2/2017, RALJ oral argument and decision affirming the conviction. App. 45. 3. The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington, Division I Solomon McLemore, Petitioner, v. City of Shoreline, Respondent, No. 77094-2-I 11/28/2017, Denied review. App. 47. 3/07/2018, Denied Motion to Modify. App. 55. 4, The Supreme Court of the State of Washington City of Shoreline, Respondent, v. Solomon McLemore, Petitioner, No. 95707-0 10/18/2018, Oral Argument. 4/18/2019, Opinion issued. App. 1 4/19/2019, Order amending Opinion. App. 37. 5/30/2019, Order amending Opinion. App. 39. 5/30/2019, Order denying McLemore’s Motion for Reconsideration. App. 41.

Docket Entries

2019-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-11-21
Reply of petitioner Solomon McLemore filed.
2019-11-15
Brief of respondent City of Shoreline, Washington in opposition filed.
2019-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 15, 2019.
2019-09-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2019 to November 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-13
Response Requested. (Due October 15, 2019)
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent City of Shoreline, Washington to respond filed.
2019-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Solomon McLemore
David Christopher IannottiStewart MacNichols Harmell, Inc., P.S., Petitioner
David Christopher IannottiStewart MacNichols Harmell, Inc., P.S., Petitioner