Did the Second Circuit err in affirming Petitioner David Greenberg's sentence without addressing the sentencing court's failure to consider the proper weight to be given Greenberg's breach of his cooperation agreement and the sentences of other defendants in order to locate its sentence within the 'boundaries of reasonableness' and the unwarranted disparity of Greenberg's 180-month sentence, a sentence more than double that imposed on any other defendant, without adequate explanation and without consideration of those other sentences?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Second Circuit err in affirming Petitioner David Greenberg’s sentence without addressing (1) the sentencing court’s failure to consider the proper weight to be given Greenberg’s breach of his cooperation agreement and the sentences of other defendants in order to locate its sentence within the “boundaries of reasonableness” and (2) the unwarranted disparity of Greenberg’s 180-month sentence, a sentence more than double that imposed on any other defendant, without adequate explanation and without consideration of those other sentences?