No. 19-207
David Grober, et al. v. Mako Products, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: burden-of-proof civil-procedure discovery due-process expense-sanctions federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-discretion litigation-compliance reasoned-decision rule-37 sanctions
Key Terms:
Patent
Patent
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the mandatory expense sanctions of FRCP Rule 37 can be circumvented by a court ignoring, or reducing them, including to zero, absent the losing party's required burden showing substantial justification, or to be unjust, AND the court's reasoned statement why a reduction comports to that burden
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented : Whether. the mandatory expense sanctions of FRCP Rule 37, ‘can be circumvented by a court ; ignoring, or reducing them, including to zero, absent the losing party's required burden showing : substantial justification, or to. be. unjust, AND the court’s reasoned statement why a reduction comports : to that burden. , . 1
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-14
Waiver of right of respondents Varnell & Warwick, P.A. to respond filed.
2019-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2019)
2019-04-11
Application (18A1036) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 4, 2019.
2019-04-03
Application (18A1036) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 15, 2019 to June 4, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
David Grober
David Grober — Petitioner
Varnell & Warwick, P.A.
Brian William Warwick — Varnell & Warwick, P.A., Respondent