No. 19-212

Hanh Thai Williams v. Succession of Fred Langford Houston

Lower Court: Louisiana
Docketed: 2019-08-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: attorney-witness campaign-contributions civil-procedure conflict-of-interest due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias judicial-conduct judicial-ethics procedural-fairness recusal standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Armand Roos' participation as Plaintiff's attorney and primary witness was procedurally and evidentiary concern a violation of Due Process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is whether Judge Cox’s failure to disclose these contributions is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. ii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Succession of Fred Langford Houston, No. 52,181-CA, Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, State of Louisiana. Judgment entered August 15, 2018. Succession of Fred Langford Houston, No. 525,127, 1st Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, State of Louisiana. Judgment entered December 15, 2016. Succession of Fred Langford Houston, No. 2019-C-0458, ; Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Review denied May 20, 2019. iii. ;

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-04
Waiver of right of respondent Succession of Fred Langford Houston to respond filed.
2019-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Hanh Thai Williams
Henry N. Brown Jr. — Petitioner
Henry N. Brown Jr. — Petitioner
Hanh Thai Williams — Petitioner
Hanh Thai Williams — Petitioner
Succession of Fred Langford Houston
Margorie L. FrazierWiener, Weiss & Madison, APC, Respondent
Margorie L. FrazierWiener, Weiss & Madison, APC, Respondent