No. 19-227
Amici (3)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-review criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review jury-disbelief jury-evaluation prejudice prejudice-analysis standard-of-review state-case-presentation state-prosecution strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court evaluating prejudice under Strickland v. Washington must take the State's case as it was presented to the jury or may hypothesize that the jury may have disbelieved the State's case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a court evaluating prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), must take the State’s case as it was presented to the jury, as ten state and federal courts have held, or whether the court may instead hypothesize that the jury may have disbelieved the State’s case, as the Maryland Court of Appeals held below. (i)
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-11-01
Reply of petitioner Adnan Syed filed.
2019-10-18
Brief of respondent State of Maryland in opposition filed.
2019-09-20
Brief amici curiae of Martin Tankleff and Thirty-Eight Other Wrongfully Convicted Individuals filed.
2019-09-20
Brief amici curiae of The Innocence Network and The Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center filed.
2019-09-17
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2019-09-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 21, 2019.
2019-09-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2019 to October 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-26
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Adnan Syed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2019)
2019-06-18
Application (18A1320) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 19, 2019.
2019-06-17
Application (18A1320) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 18, 2019 to August 19, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Adnan Syed
Catherine Emily Stetson — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Catherine Emily Stetson — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Martin Tankleff and Thirty-Eight Other Wrongfully Convicted Individuals
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Lindsay C. Harrison — Jenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
Lindsay C. Harrison — Jenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
The Innocence Network and The Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center