No. 19-238
In Re Hotze Health Wellness Center International One, LLC, et al.
Tags: appellate-review article-iii-standing civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction en-banc-review proposition-65 remand-order removal standing subject-matter-jurisdiction supplemental-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Environmental JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Environmental JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the remand order constitutes an appealable abuse of discretion for failing to reach or resolve the jurisdictional issues raised below
Question Presented (from Petition)
question presented are: (1) Whether the remand order constitutes an appealable abuse of discretion for failing to reach or resolve the jurisdictional issues raised below. (2) Whether Article III and _ subject-matter jurisdiction exists for the removed state-court action. (3) Whether Circuit Rule 27-10 violates FED. R. App. P. 47(a) for inconsistency on en banc review. i
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-07
Supplemental brief of petitioner Hotze Health & Wellness Center International One, L.L.C., et al. filed.
2019-10-07
Reply of petitioner Hotze Health & Wellness Center International One, L.L.C., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-09-23
Brief of respondent Environmental Research Center in opposition filed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Environmental Research Center
Jason Robert Flanders — Aqua Terra Aeris Law Group, Respondent
Jason Robert Flanders — Aqua Terra Aeris Law Group, Respondent
Hotze Health & Wellness Center International One, L.L.C., et al.
Lawrence J. Joseph — Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Petitioner
Lawrence J. Joseph — Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Petitioner