No. 19-269
Harold A. Flores v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Tags: adverse-employment-action burden-of-proof civil-rights employment-discrimination employment-law evidence prima-facie-case quantum-of-evidence retaliation summary-judgment title-vii
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What quantum of evidence is sufficient to survive summary judgment on a Title VII retaliation claim?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question Presented What quantum of evidence is sufficient to survive summary judgment on a Title VII retaliation claim — here, that defendant Entergy retaliated against its employee, plaintiff Flores, for supporting a colleague’s racial discrimination claim?
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Harold A. Flores
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner