No. 19-270

Patricia Rodriguez v. LPP Mortgage Ltd., LP

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: attorney-fees attorney-sanctions civil-procedure client-advocacy credible-arguments due-process legal-ethics rule-11 sanctions zealous-representation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether rule-11-sanctions-against-attorney-should-be-reversed

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In the instant case, attorney Patricia Rodriguez, and Rodriguez Law Group, Inc. were improperly sanctioned under Rule 11. The firm zealously represented Defendant ‘and Counterclaimant David W. Gates (Gates) and made credible arguments by analogy to existing law in the counter claim. However, the end result lead to an award of attorney fees in the amount of $17,474.50, jointly and severally, as a sanction Gates and his attorney. Attorney for Gates, believes that the counter claim filed by Gates was not frivolous and the order for sanctions under rule 11 should be reversed in its entirety. ; 1. Whether rule 11 sanctions against attorney Patricia Rodriguez and her law firm should be reversed, as it conflicted with her duty to represent her client zealously a with credible arguments. it }

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent LPP Mortgage Ltd., LP to respond filed.
2019-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)

Attorneys

LPP Mortgage Ltd., LP
Regina J. McClendonLock Lord, LLP, Respondent
Regina J. McClendonLock Lord, LLP, Respondent
Patricia Rodriguez
Patricia R. Rodriguez — Petitioner
Patricia R. Rodriguez — Petitioner