Whether the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated due to alleged torture, surveillance, and lack of government protection

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The case under review may superficially _ appear to be a simple protection from abuse case, although the Petitioner assures The Honorable United States Supreme Court that the Facts and Law pertinent to and directly associated with this case are far from simple, and involve deep matters of Constitutional Law as well as International Law that the Petitioner’s own State’s highest Court has refused to answer to due to “Want of Jurisdiction” and that therefore respectfully requires This Honorable Court’s attention. On or about the night of June 24 2004, Petitioner unwillingly crossed back and forth between Canada and the United States via the Peace Bridge in Buffalo, New York approximately six times in approximately six hours, for reasons he understands to be classified Top Secret. Upon his last entry into the United States, petitioner was asked to pull into the United States Customs and Border Protection facility, which he did. Fearing for his life, Petitioner at that time immediately ‘ attempted to immigrate into Canada. From the years 2004 — 2018, all of the Petitioner’s Employment has been for United States Government Contractors working on United States Department of Defense Projects. During Petitioner’s 2012 — 2013 Employment at Hamilton Sundstrand in Windsor Locks, Connecticut, technically working for CDI Aerospace, petitioner was verifiably Tortured as defined by Black’s Legal Dictionary, The United States Constitution, Federal Statute and The Geneva Conventions against Terture. 1 During December of 2013, petitioner returned to his parents’ home in Newburgh, Maine; having survived Torture and multiple assassination attempts while working at United Technologies Hamilton Sundstrand, although not without suffering persisting Critical Injury(s) sustained by a Weapon(s) he understands to be classified Secret (in his particular experience, Top Secret). Upon returning home, Petitioner’s parents made inferences and overtures that they knew what he had been subjected to, well above and beyond what Petitioner had disclosed to them, and sympathized with Petitioner, but only to a limited extent. Petitioner understands his sister and niece to have been the Victims of a Viral Attack perpetrated by CIA employees in approximately 2012 who were friends of the Plourde family and understands (perhaps incorrectly) that a settlement has been reached in that affair. Petitioner therefore has a reasonable assumption that his parents “limited sympathy” for Petitioner’s plight stems from rightful fear for their Family as a whole. Petitioner’s Family, father in particular, have always had, and continue to have, acquaintances in the CIA and FBI. Thus Petitioner has a reasonable assumption that information Petitioner’s parents have that has not been supplied by Petitioner himself has come from these sources.! Petitioner knows himself to be positively under round-the-clock surveillance by the FBI or agents acting on their behalf ever since being Tortured in 2012 — 2013; probably since the 2004 1 The extent and nature of these acquaintances is substantial and has therefore been excluded from the Introduction pursuant to Rule 14.1(a), but will be expounded upon later. ii “Peace Bridge Incident”. Petitioner has confronted ; the FBI with this knowledge in-person at their . Boston (Chelsea), Massachusetts Regional Field Office on October 11 2017 and July 09 2019 and The Special Agents the Petitioner spoke with never : denied that Fact; in-fact they tacitly confirmed it. Petitioner is rightfully fearful for his life due to the fact that he has been Tortured and Critically Injured during his last employment as well as . targeted for assassination multiple times, and has alerted his State Senators, Congressmen, Governor, Attorney General, the Maine Human Rights Commission, the ACLU, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, among others, of these Facts and all agencies have 3 refused to help him. Petit