Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two void 'proposed' State Court rulings produced by a former Associate Judge, employed solely by Dallas County, who failed to acquire authority from the Judge of Record for the Dallas County Probate Court or the State Probate Court Judge, as required by State Law, to enter a Dallas County Probate Court and who failed to obtain a sign-off of his rulings from the Judge of Record within 30 days of their creation, as required by State Law?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two Void [not voidable but, void] “proposed” State Court oo Rulings produced by a former Associate Judge, em, . ployed solely by Dallas County, who failed to acquire authority from the Judge of Record for the Dallas County Probate Court or the State Probate Court Judge, as required by State Law, to enter a Dallas County Probate Court and who failed to obtain a signoff of his rulings from the Judge of Record within 30 ; . days of their creation, as required by State Law? : For the record, the Dallas County employed Associate Judge has been removed as a Jurist by the State | of Texas as the State has deemed him to be unfit. i ii