Whether U.S. District Court violated client's right to jury trial under U.S. Const. Amend VII, and XIV due process, equal protection of the laws

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether U.S. District Court violated client’s right to jury trial under U.S. Const. Amend VII, and XIV due process, equal protection of the laws when they entered summary judgment for the client’s former attorney when a genuine issue of fact exists? The district court failed to properly docket 47 exhibits filed with the complaint undermining the integrity of the proceeding: preventing the court from considering all material facts; hence substantially prejudicing the attorney’s former client. 2. Whether the Utah Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction under the final judgment rule and collateral order doctrine when it accepted an interlocutory appeal from Utah Fourth District Court denial of summary judgment for both seller and buyer when material fact exists and required both parties to conduct discovery? i