Whether the circuit court's failure to notify Petitioner to be heard and object to its sanction under Fed. R. Appl. P. 38 for costs under Fed. Appl. P. 39(a)(2) deprived Petitioner of due process of law, thereby making its judgment void?

question presented is whether the circuit court's . ; failure to notify Petitioner to be heard and object to its sanction under Fed. R. Appl. P. 38 for costs under Fed. Appl. P. 39(a)(2) deprived Petitioner of due process of _ law, thereby making its judgment void? i 2. This court decided in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, (1974) that whether on jurisdiction or failure to state a claim, “[w]hen a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges' orders are... VOID.” : The question presented is whether the district and circuit court acted prematurely and henceerroneously by their failure to follow precedent law of Pacheco for discovery before deciding that Petitioner failed to state a claim and was frivolous, thus losing subjectmatter jurisdiction, therefore their judgments are . void? ; i