No. 19-32
Gordon Scott Stroh v. Saturna Capital Corporation
Tags: cause-of-action civil-procedure dismissal evidence evidence-dismissal motion-in-limine standard-of-review summary-judgment trial-court
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
What is the appropriate standard of review when a trial court improperly grants a motion in limine that has the practical effect of dismissing an entire cause of action?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the appropriate standard of review when a trial court improperly grants a motion in limine that has the practical effect of dismissing an entire cause of action?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-02
Brief amicus curiae of Project on Government Oversight, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2019-07-18
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Gordon Scott Stroh.
2019-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-09
Waiver of right of respondents Saturna Capital Corp., et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 2, 2019)
2019-04-18
Application (18A1065) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 1, 2019.
2019-04-15
Application (18A1065) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 2, 2019 to July 1, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
GORDON SCOTT STROH
Stephen M. Kohn — Kohn, Kohn and Colapinto, LLP, Petitioner
Project on Government Oversight, Inc.
Neil L. Henrichsen — Henrichsen Law Group PLLC, Amicus
SATURNA CAPITAL CORPORATION, et al.
Jeffrey Bruce Coopersmith — Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Respondent