No. 19-324
Technology Properties Limited LLC, et al. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure due-process standing supreme-court-precedent the-patent-act federal-circuit patent patent-act patent-law prosecution-history-disclaimer separation-of-powers supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Trademark Patent Privacy
Trademark Patent Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's development and application of the doctrine of 'prosecution history disclaimer' is consistent with fundamental principles of separation of powers, the Patent Act, and long-established Supreme Court precedent
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s development and application of the doctrine of “prosecution history disclaimer” is consistent with fundamental principles of separation of powers, the Patent Act, and long-established Supreme Court precedent.
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-10
Waiver of right of respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-10-10
Waiver of right of respondents Nintendo of America, Inc. & Nintendo Co., Ltd. to respond filed.
2019-10-09
Waiver of right of respondents LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics USA, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2019)
2019-07-03
Application (19A17) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 7, 2019.
2019-06-27
Application (19A17) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 9, 2019 to September 7, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Joseph B. Warden — Fish & Richardson, P.C., Respondent
Nintendo of America, Inc. & Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Matthew J. Brigham — Cooley, LLP, Respondent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
James M. Heintz — DLA Piper LLP, Respondent
Technology Properties Limited LLC,, et al.
Denise Marie De Mory — Bunsow De Mory LLP, Petitioner