No. 19-332
Steven E. Davis, et al. v. Bank of America Corporation, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 28-usc-1915 civil-litigation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process forma-pauperis judicial-access legal-costs pro-se pro-se-litigants standing
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy
Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do pro se litigants have any 'CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Pro Se Petitioners were unequivocally . deprived of all their "Constitutional Rights". Seven Petitioners were wrongfully denied the right to file forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.Congress enacted 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) to Enable Plaintiffs who could not afford the costs of litigation to bring civil lawsuits. The questioned asked? Do pro se litigants have any “CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS”
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondents Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.
Andrew C. Glass — K&L Gates LLP, Respondent
Andrew C. Glass — K&L Gates LLP, Respondent