Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying the petitioners' request for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to recuse itself from the underlying case

No question identified. : CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I Matthew Melaragno, do swear or declare that on the date specified below, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the following: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS; CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE On each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing the documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days. The name(s) and addresse(s) of those served are as follows: Catherine Woodbridge, Esq. Office of the California Attorney General 12 Floor 1300 I Street Suite 125 Sacramento, CA 95814 Landon D. Bailey, Attorney Bailey PLC 980 9th Street 16th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 14, 2019. s/ Matthew Melaragno