No. 19-361

Renado Smith and Richard Delancy v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-evidence criminal-procedure custody-release deposition-testimony due-process good-faith-effort investigative-steps prosecutorial-misconduct prosecutorial-procedure sixth-amendment testimonial-statement unavailability witness-unavailability
Key Terms:
Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government makes a good-faith effort to obtain a witness's presence at trial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Confrontation Clause permits prosecutors to introduce the out-of-court testimonial statements of an absent witness only if the witness is “unavailable” despite the government’s “good-faith effort to obtain [the witness’s] presence at trial.” Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 724-725 (1968). The questions presented are: 1. Whether the government makes a good-faith effort to obtain a witness’s presence at trial if it curtails its search for that witness because it already has the witness’s deposition testimony. 2. Whether the government makes a good-faith effort to obtain a witness’s presence at trial if it forgoes an “easy” investigative step that it has “reason to believe” would procure the absent witness. 3. Whether a witness is “unavailable” if the government releases the witness from its custody without making any arrangements to secure the witness’s presence at trial. (i)

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-23
Reply of petitioners Renado Smith, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-09
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-10-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2019.
2019-10-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-18
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Defense Organizations filed.
2019-10-18
Brief amicus curiae of The Constitution Project at the Project On Government Oversight filed.
2019-10-18
Brief amicus curiae of Florida Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2019-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2019.
2019-10-10
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Renado Smith, et al.
2019-10-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 18, 2019 to November 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Criminal Defense Organizations
Thomas C. GoldsteinGoldstein & Russell, P.C., Amicus
Florida Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Amicus
Renado Smith, et al.
Neal Kumar KatyalHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
The Constitution Project at the Project On Government Oversight
Kevin Brian MuhlendorfWiley Rein, LLP, Amicus
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent