No. 19-363

Jim R. Nash v. Norma Nash, et al.

Lower Court: Arkansas
Docketed: 2019-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts fourteenth-amendment full-faith-and-credit jurisdiction personal-jurisdiction state-court state-courts substitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a judgment without jurisdiction of the decedent violates the petitioner's right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Ifseveral states following close versions of Rule 25 (FRCP) have held that judgments without jurisdiction of the decedent are a nullity, and those same state courts and at least two U.S. Circuit Courts have condemned such treatment of the substitution process, does judgment without jurisdiction here violate petitioner's right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment? 2) The effects of state court judgments can cross many borders. Are we allowing tactics in litigation to circumvent the importance of personal jurisdiction? i

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondents Norma Nash, et al. to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Jim Nash
J. R. NashNASH LAW FIRM, Petitioner
J. R. NashNASH LAW FIRM, Petitioner
Norma Nash, et al.
Ed Daniel IVEd Daniel IV, P.A., Respondent
Ed Daniel IVEd Daniel IV, P.A., Respondent