Takings DueProcess Copyright
Violation of Constitutional Rights
Questions Presented for Review | 1. Violation of Constitutional Rights Did acts of a federal court in publishing sealed documents of investigation rather than returning them, violate rights of the Plaintiff (a) against the taking of private property, (b) to due process and equal protection, (c) against the seizure of papers and effects, and (d) to the copyright in sealed documents? Shall this Court order compensation under the takings clause? 2. Resolution of Conflicting Jurisdiction Denials Will the Court (a) clarify the conflicting and evasive jurisdiction decisions of the circuit courts, to ensure jurisdiction of federal claims in either the Court of Federal Claims or district courts, and (b) review the case de novo, to avoid remand to biased courts? 3. False “Sovereign Immunity” to Nullify Rights Does the lower court resurrection of the tyrant’s defense of “sovereign immunity” violate and seek to nullify the rights of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including the Takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Tucker Act and Federal Tort Claims Act, the Civil Rights Act, and many prior decisions of this Supreme Court? . 1 . PARTIES : . 1. Plaintiff John S. Barth, jr. is the author of a copyrighted novel titled The , National Memorial, hereinafter "property of Plaintiff," or “subject property." : Plaintiff is represented pro se, but is well able to argue and brief the case in a competent manner. 2. Defendant United States is sued in its liability for compensation of damages due ; ‘ to taking of private property without just compensation, denial.of property without due process of law, denial of equal protection of law, unlawful seizure of papers and ; effects, and violation of copyright law. >