Whether the District Court violated the Due Process Clause by disallowing the interview of the jurors

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The testimony presented in the instant matter as well as the underlying facts and circumstances reveal that the following issues, which form the basis of the appeal, are each to be answered strongly in the favor. A. Whether the District Court violated the Due Process Clause by disallowing the interview of the jurors in furtherance of determining whether a jury taint and/or jury tampering occurred during the trial proceedings in this matter. B. Whether the District Court erred in its oral ruling, whereby Exhibit 7 was permitted for use as an accident report, that provided Workers’ Compensation references which caused confusion as evidenced by the jury question prior to verdict. ii PARTIES TO PROCEEDING The undersigned counselors of record for the Petitioner certify that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or refusal. I. Parties: a. Petitioner Shamberia Smith was Plaintiff in the District Court proceedings and the Appellant the Fifth Circuit case. b. Respondent KANSA TECHNOLOGY, LLC was the Defendant in the District Court proceedings and the Appellee in the Fifth Circuit case. I. Counsel for the a. The Johnson Law Group, APLC; Willie G. Johnson, Jr., Sophia J. Riley, Derek Elsey and Jennifer Robinson Ill. Counsels for the a. KANSA TECHNOLOGY, LLC —Duplass, Zwain, Bourgeois, Pfister, Weinstock & Bogart; Guy Valdin and Jade Wandell May this certificate of interested parties be deemed proper in the premise. ili STATEMENT OF